[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 1 (4-2022) ::
ILR 2022, 3(1): 23-47 Back to browse issues page
The Rules and Effects of Brain and Hypothetical Death in Iranian Jurisprudence and Criminal Law
Fatemeh Teymorzadeh1 , Hasab Hajitabar Firoozjai 2
1- M.A, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.
2- Associat Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanity Science, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr Branch, Qaemshahr, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
Abstract:   (564 Views)
Background and Aim: One of the controversial contemporary issues, which is the result of the advancement of modern medical technologies in recent decades, is the issue of brain death and legal challenges related to the effects and rulings on this situation. Investigating and explaining the rulings related to brain death and hypothetical death in Iranian criminal law is one of the objectives of this study.
Materials and Methods: The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical.
Ethical Considerations: All ethical considerations have been observed.
Findings: The findings and results of this study have shown that, firstly, in case of proving the defendant's presumed death in the criminal proceedings, the judicial authority is obliged to issue an endowment for prosecution. Secondly, if the absent person (hypothetical deceased) is found after a final verdict is issued, there is the possibility of prosecution and re-investigation. Thirdly, crimes against a person with brain death are considered to be a crime against the dead in Iranian law. Finally after observing the formalities in case of proof of the defendant's vegetative state, the judicial authority shall order the temporary filing of the case by appointment of supervision.
Conclusion: The rule of brain death is like actual death.
Keywords: Brain Death, Hypothetical Death, Felony, Trial, Criminal Law of Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 886 kb]   (264 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/01/7 | Revised: 2022/04/22 | Accepted: 2022/03/1 | Published: 2022/04/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Teymorzadeh F, Hajitabar Firoozjai H. The Rules and Effects of Brain and Hypothetical Death in Iranian Jurisprudence and Criminal Law. ILR 2022; 3 (1) :23-47
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-163-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 1 (4-2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645