[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 4 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Jan 2020) ::
ILR 2020, 1(4): 95-108 Back to browse issues page
Investigating the Dimensions of Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism in the Human Rights Discourse
Neda Heidarymoghaddam
M.A, Department of International Commercial Law, University of Tajikestan, Tajikestan.
Abstract:   (524 Views)
Background and Aim: Human rights are moral principles or norms for certain standards of human behavior. Human rights are basically about the rights and entitlements that you as a human being enjoy. Terrorism aims to destroy democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Terrorism threatens the dignity and security of human beings everywhere. It threatens peace and security. Islamic fundamentalist terrorism is a type of terrorism that opposes modernity and believes in the inherent superiority of religious beliefs, ideas and programs, and aims to destroy human rights.
Materials and Methods: The research method in this paper is descriptive-analytical.
Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations regarding the writing of texts as well as references to sources were observed.
Findings: One of the fundamental debates in human rights is its universality and relativity. For example, the right to human dignity, the right to life, and cases like these are for the human race. In contrast, human rights relativism depends on religion, culture, and so on. . Terrorism affects human rights and targets its values, including the right to life, liberty, and so on. Terrorism fights the values ​​that underlie the Charter of the United Nations and other international instruments. The direct link between terrorism and Islam was formed by al-Qaeda on September 11, 2001, and came from the realm of thought to act.
Conclusion: Because terrorism affects the enjoyment of human rights and the functioning of society, governments must take action in Actions adopt the direction of confronting it. Because terrorism has a detrimental effect on the enjoyment of a wide range of fundamental human rights, governments are not only justified but also obliged to take effective measures to combat it.
 
Keywords: Human Rights, Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism, Multilateral Diplomacy, Permissible Margin Doctrine.
Full-Text [PDF 1204 kb]   (176 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/10/6 | Revised: 2020/11/2 | Accepted: 2020/11/9 | Published: 2021/01/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heidarymoghaddam N. Investigating the Dimensions of Islamic Fundamentalist Terrorism in the Human Rights Discourse. ILR 2020; 1 (4) :95-108
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-162-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 4 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Jan 2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645