1- PhD Student of Political Science, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University Zanjan. Tehran, Iran & Zanjan 2- Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University Zanjan. Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author) & Zanjan 3- Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University Zanjan. Tehran, Iran. & Zanjan
Abstract: (398 Views)
Background and Aim:One of the major issues of human rights today is the duality of universal human rights and relativism. Both approaches have supporters and opponents and each of them seeks to explain their point of view and each government, under the influence of its philosophical foundations and cultural and religious values, has taken a different approach to this issue. Materials and Methods: The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical. Ethical Considerations:All ethical principles have been observed in the writing stages of this research.
Findings and Conclusion:The present article explains that in order to understand human rights, one must first understand relativism. The question that this article tries to answer is, are human rights really absolute? The hypothesis that is raised in response to the mentioned question and the percentage of its explanation is that even those who believe in absolutism in human rights and believe in the absoluteness of human rights in the theoretical field, when they enter the field of action they express the relativity of human rights. It concludes that even the absolutists in their actions with a relativistic approach are looking for the non-realization of human rights. The findings of this article indicate that by stating what things in the supply of action can one believe in relativism.
Ahadifar M, Malek Z, Jafari S F. Relativism of Human Rights in Practice; Absolutism of Human Rights in Words. ILR 2024; 5 (2) : 1 URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-248-en.html