[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 2 (5-2026) ::
ILR 2026, 7(2): 41-49 Back to browse issues page
Jurisprudential and Legal Review of Iranian and Islamic Criminal Policy Toward Terrorism
Marzieh Mohammadi1 , Siamak Jafar Zadeh2
1- M.A. in Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
2- Associate Professor in Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Abstract:   (70 Views)
As one of the most severe threats to life, human dignity, and public security, terrorist acts are condemned and criminalized in both Islamic jurisprudence and Iranian criminal law, adopting an approach based on the prohibition of killing innocent people, the ban on causing terror and social corruption, and the necessity of repelling danger. Aiming to elucidate the jurisprudential foundations, legal frameworks, and criminal policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran toward terrorism, the present study demonstrates that in jurisprudence, the fundamental principle is the prohibition of targeted attacks on civilians and the creation of public terror. Furthermore, actions such as direct perpetration, complicity, ordering, and providing operational grounds (including financing, logistics, training, and facilitation) can entail criminal liability. Moreover, in Iranian positive law, criminal policy is centered on the extensive criminalization of terrorism-related behaviors, the aggravation of sanctions, and the adoption of deterrent approaches; the mere commission of a terrorist act is not the sole ground for liability, but organized participation and roles in planning, procuring tools, supporting, and organizing are also subject to criminal prosecution. Finally, the paper concludes by emphasizing that the alignment of jurisprudential foundations with the security objectives of criminal law justifies the adoption of stringent policies to prevent, combat, and mitigate the impacts of terrorism on society.
Keywords: Terrorism, Islamic Jurisprudence, Public Security, Criminalization, Criminal Policy
Full-Text [PDF 731 kb]   (33 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/08/18 | Revised: 2025/10/24 | Accepted: 2025/12/4 | Published: 2026/06/22
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadi M, Jafar Zadeh S. Jurisprudential and Legal Review of Iranian and Islamic Criminal Policy Toward Terrorism. ILR 2026; 7 (2) :41-49
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-341-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 2 (5-2026) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.03 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741