[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 2 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Jul 2020) ::
ILR 2020, 1(2): 51-65 Back to browse issues page
Passing of Risk in the Contract of Carriage of Goods Sold
Hossein Heidari Monavar 1, Sadegh Mehrdoust2
1- Department of Law, Faculty of Humanity Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
2- PhD in Civil Law, Advisor in International Contracts and Eenergy, Iran
Abstract:   (2373 Views)
Background and Aim: In the contract of sale especially where the sale involves a contract of carriage of goods, this important question arises that in the case of loss or damage without fault before delivering the Sold goods, Who is responsible for damages or losses taken place in that case? Seller or buyer? Since the international trades and also internal trades for sale of goods requires special contractual forms (Incoterms rules), it is necessary to answer the above questions in relation to the rules of Incoterms.
Materials and Methods: For present study, the descriptive approach has been chosen and relevant information collected by the documentary and library method.
Ethical Considerations: In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and confidentiality have been observed.
Findings: Among trade terms mentioned in Incoterms that are used for different methods of  goods carriage, the EXW, FCA, CPT, CIP, DAP, DAT and DDP  are of importance. These methods are divided to two kinds of “Delivery to Carrier” and “Deliver to Buyer”.
Conclusion: Contrary to domestic law which passing of risk requires delivery of goods, in Vienna convention the risk of sale is imposed on the buyer. Since in Incoterms, the carriage of goods sold is usually associated with a variety of issues and also the deviations in it can postpone the delivery of goods and delay in passing of risk delivery, Incoterms try to ban these unusual obstacles. In Iran there is no special rule about the effect of carriage contract on delivery of goods and passing of risk but it is possible to apply articles 380, 387, 567 and 349 of civil law for carriage contracts.
Keywords: Incoterms, Sale, Delivery, Passing of Risk, Contract of Carriage, Viena Convention, Iranian Law
Full-Text [PDF 1176 kb]   (1395 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2020/05/14 | Revised: 2020/06/1 | Accepted: 2020/06/4 | Published: 2020/07/1
References
1. Asghari Aghmashhadi, F & Mohajer, M (2005). "Passing of Risk In contracts Involve Delivery of Goods". Journal of Trade Studies, 35(1): 101-123. (Persian)
2. Darab Pour, M (1995). An Interpretation for International Contract Law. Vol 3. Tehran: Gang Danesh Press. (Persian)
3. Dastbaz, H (2008). "Goods Carriage". Tehran: Faculty of Economic Science Press. (Persian)
4. Dezfouuli, M (1990). Al-Makaseb. Vol 6. 3rd ed. Qum: Dar Al-Kotob. (Arabic)
5. Ghasem Zadeh, SM (2008). Civil Law, Principles of Contracts and Obligations. 9th ed. Tehran: Dadgostar Press. (Persian)
6. Helli, A (1989). Sharaye-Al-eslam. 2nd ed. Beirut: Toras Press. (Arabic)
7. Kashi, K (2000). "Transfer of Guarantee in International Sale of Goods". Journal of Dadrasi, 24(1): 37-42. (Persian)
8. Katouzian, N (1997). Civil Law, General Principles of Contracts. 2nd ed. Tehran: Enteshar Press. (Persian)
9. Katouzian, N (2008). Civil Law, Special Contracts. Vol 1. Tehran: Ganj Danesh Press. (Persian)
10. Maraghi, m (1998). Al-Anavin. Vol 2. 1st ed. Tehran: Islamic Institute Press. (Arabic)
11. Mohaghegh Damad, SM (1994). Juridical Rules. 4th ed. Tehran: Islamic Sciences Center Press. (Persian)
12. Najafi, MH (1984). Javaher Al-Kalam. Vol 22. Beirut: Toras Press. (Arabic)
13. Oloumi Yazdi, HR (2001). "Definition of Delivery and its Relation to Transfer of Ownership and Risk". Studies on Law and Politics, 5(1): 66-96. (Persian)
14. Ramberg, J (2005). "To What Extent Do Incoterms2000 Vary Articles". Journal of Law and Commerce, 67(2): 68 -69.
15. Romein, A (2003). Passing of Risk: A comparison between the Passing of Risk under the CISG and German Law. Available at: http://cisgw3 .Law.Pace.edu/. (Last Revised: 2020)
16. Safai, SH (2008). International Sale Law. Tehran: Tehran University Press. (Persian)
17. Schmitthoff, C (1999). International Trade Law. Translated by: Behrouz Akhlaghi Et Al, 1st ed. Tehran: Samt Press. (Persian)
18. Shirzad, A (2001). IncoTerms Guidance. Tehran: International Trade Office Press. (Persian)
19. Soltani Nejad, H (1999). "Passing of Risk". Name Mofid, 18(1): 76-91. (Persian) [DOI:10.1023/A:1022934611135]
20. Taromsari, M (2008). Inco Terms 2000. Tehran: Trade Studies Institute Press. (Persian)
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heidari Monavar H, Mehrdoust S. Passing of Risk in the Contract of Carriage of Goods Sold. ILR 2020; 1 (2) :51-65
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-39-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 2 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Jul 2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645