[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 3 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Oct 2020) ::
ILR 2020, 1(3): 84-101 Back to browse issues page
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights from the Standpoint of Classic Philosophical Schools of International Law
Ebrahim Yaghouti 1, Farid Beiranvand2
1- Jurisprudence and Basics of Islamic Law Department, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tehran Centeral Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
2- Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tehran Centeral Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (2175 Views)
Background and Aim: Science of law is an instrument to regulate the relationships between persons and subjects. Doubtlessly, today human persons as the main subjects of law also are considered as the ultimate intent of law; as the result, human rights have a very important status in the governing legal order.
Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive Study.
Ethical Considerations: All ethical considerations as well as authenticity of the texts have been observed.
Findings: The very concept of human rights by a reading different from the current one, have been existed since the early stage of birth of philosophical thoughts; but, through the time and by the introduction of concepts such as “government”, “sovereignty”, “law”, and “rule of law” the way of human right entering the space of implementation undergone basic evolutions.
Conclusion: In the text of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, one may see how schools of philosophy, law, and politics have been crystalized in it.
Keywords: Philosophical Schools, Human Rights, Natural Rights, Positivistic Rights, Utilitarianism
Full-Text [PDF 1138 kb]   (1081 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2020/08/23 | Revised: 2020/09/18 | Accepted: 2020/09/24 | Published: 2020/10/1
References
1. Adimassu, Y (2015). The Right to Freedom of Movement and Residence. Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.
2. AliKhani, M (2001). International Law. Tehran: Khat Sevom Publishing. (Persian)
3. AliKhani, M (2001). Iranians National Identity. Tehran: Dastan Press. (Persian)
4. Aure, A (2008). Secular and Subjective Concept of Natural Law. Grmany: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History.
5. Bagheri, M (2009). Philosophical Schools in International Law. Tehran: Mizan. (Persian)
6. Bahalla, L (1991). Human Right an Institutional Framework for Implementation. Delhi: Docta Shelf.
7. Brett, A (1997). Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought. Cambridge: University Press.
8. Celermajer, D (2018). The Prevention of Torture: An Ecological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/9781108556583]
9. Da Lomba, S (2004). The Right to Seek Refugee Status in the European :union:. Oxford: Intersentia.
10. De Beco, G; Quinlivan, S & Lord, J (2019). The Right to Inclusive Education in International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/9781316392881]
11. Donders, Y & Volodin, V (2007). Human Rights in Education, Science, and Culture. UNESCO.
12. Eckes, C (2009). EU Counter-Terrorist Policies and Fundamental Rights: The Case of Individual Sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573769.001.0001]
13. Faunce, T (2004). Pilgrims in Medicine: Conscience, Legalism and Human Rights: An Allegory of Medical Humanities, Foundational Virtues, Ethical Principles, Law and Human Rights in Medical Personal and Professional Development. London: Brill.
14. Goodman, R & Jinks, D (2004). "How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law". Duke Law Journal, 54 (3): 621-703.
15. Guðmundur, S & Alfreðsson, A (1999). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Common Standard of Achievement. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
16. Hakonssen, K (1996). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139172905]
17. Heijden, B & Tahzib-Lie, B (1998). Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Fiftieth Anniversary Anthology. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
18. Hochstrasser, T (2000). Natural Law theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge: University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511490552]
19. Hohmann, J & Weller, M (2018). The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: A Commentary. Oxford: University Press.
20. Hugo, G (2002). The Rights of war and Peace. Vol 1, Hague: Liberty Fund.
21. Keane, D & McDermott, Y (2012). The Challenge of Human Rights: Past, Present and Future. London: Edward Elgar. [DOI:10.4337/9780857939012]
22. Kippenberg, H; Kuiper, Y & Sanders, A (2012). Concepts of Person in Religion and Thought. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
23. Lawson, E & Lou Bertucci, M (1996). Encyclopedia of Human Rights. London: Taylor & Francis.
24. Loveless, S & Holman, T (2007). The Family in the New Millennium: The Place of Family in Human Society. London: Praeger.
25. Mansbach, R (2012). Introduction to Global Politics. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
26. Marias, J (1967). History of Philosophy. New York: Dover Publications.
27. McCrudden, C (2015). Human Rights: Law, Politics, And Philosophy. Michigan: University of Michigan Law School.
28. Menendez, A (2006). Arguing Fundamental Right. Netherland: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/1-4020-4919-4]
29. Miguelángel, V; Philani, M & Wilkins, A (2020). The Global Politics of Human Rights: Bringing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: UNISA.
30. Modrzejewski, B (2012). Law Books. Bialystok: Wydawnictwo Temida.
31. Morsink, J (1996). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and Intent. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32. Nolan, C (2015). Ethics and Statecraft: The Moral Dimension of International Affairs. Denver: ABC-CLIO.
33. Oakley, F (2005). Natural Law, Laws of Nature, Natural Rights: Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Ideas. New York - London: Continuum.
34. Reidar, M & Schaffer, J (2017). Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice. Cambridge: University Press.
35. Riedel, E (2006). Social Security as a Human Right. London: Springer.
36. Sharma, A (2010). Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Indian Law. New Delhi: PHI Learning.
37. Sharma, A (2011). Problematizing Religious Freedom. London: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-90-481-8993-9]
38. Spaak, T (2014). A Critical Appraisal of Karl Olivecrona's Legal Philosophy. Switzerland: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-06167-2]
39. Sweet, W (2003). Philosophical Theory and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
40. Takemura, H (2008). International Human Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Individual Duties to Disobey Manifestly Illegal Orders. London: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-70527-7]
41. Tierney, B (1997). The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law, 1150-1625. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
42. Tomuschat, C (2003). Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Weissbrodt, D &, Vega, C (2007). International Human Rights Law: An Introduction. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
44. Wodon, Q (2001). Attacking Extreme Poverty: Learning from the Experience of the International Movement ATD Fourth World. Vol 23, Washington: World Bank Technical Paper. [DOI:10.1596/0-8213-4939-2]
45. Wronka, J (1998). Human Rights and Social Policy in the 21st Century. US: University Press of America.
46. Zol-Ein, P (2011). Basis of International General Law. 7th ed. Tehran: Political & International Office Publishing. (Persian)
47. Zolo, D (2010). Humanitarian Militarism?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Zuckert, M (1997). "Do Natural Rights Derive from Natural Law?". Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 64(3): 389-406.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yaghouti E, Beiranvand F. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights from the Standpoint of Classic Philosophical Schools of International Law. ILR 2020; 1 (3) :84-101
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-47-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 3 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Oct 2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645