[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 4 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Jan 2020) ::
ILR 2020, 1(4): 33-48 Back to browse issues page
Maritime Delimitation Zones in the Framework of Customary Rules
Somayeh Rasoulpour Nalkiashary1 , Afshin Jafari 2, AbdolKarim Shaheydar3
1- Faculty of Theology and Islamic Sciences, Graguateg Center of Payame-noor University, Tehran, Iran
2- in Public International Law & lecture of Payame-noor University, Tehran Iran. (Corresponding Author)
3- in Public International Law & lecture of Payame-noor University, Tehran Iran
Abstract:   (2119 Views)
Background and Aim: The international law of the seas is based on the strong shoulders of the powerful system of international custom that has been repeatedly cited by international judicial and arbitration authorities. Therefore, in a comprehensive study, it was necessary to study the customary rules of delimitation of maritime areas, which have undergone many changes and transformations over the centuries. The present article examines this trend with a brief look at the customary rules of delimitation of maritime areas.
Materials and Methods: The research method in this paper is descriptive-analytical.
Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations regarding the writing of texts as well as references to sources were observed.
Findings: Customary international law has played an important role in the process of forming the international law of the seas and shaping the necessary criteria to evaluate its rules. The principle of the commonality of the seas, the national authority over the seas, the principle of the freedom of the seas in the Middle Ages, the judgment of the maritime courts and the legal opinions of the maritime dispute resolution authorities are evidence of the customary rules governing the seas. If the customary rules are so effective in the formation of the rules of delimitation of maritime areas that need special attention, then the course of its evolution was examined and the impact of customary rules on the development of the law of the sea was examined.
Conclusion: This article emphasizes that customary law has not provided a specific method for delimitation that is legally binding or creates a privileged position over other methods.
Keywords: Maritime Delimitation, Middle Lline, Territorial Sea, Maritime Law, Customary International Law
Full-Text [PDF 996 kb]   (879 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2020/11/22 | Revised: 2021/01/22 | Accepted: 2020/12/19 | Published: 2021/01/1
References
1. Alaska Boundary Case (Great Britain/United States).15 Reports of Internatioanl Arbitral Awards, 1903.
2. Anderson, D (2007). The Modern Law of the Sea. Lieden, Boston: Publications on Ocean Development.
3. Blech, Edward C (1845-1937). British & Foreing State Papers. London: H.M.S.O.
4. Cassesse, A (2005). International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Castillo, L (2015). Law of the Sea: From Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of Sea. Boston: Brili Nijhoff. [DOI:10.1163/9789004283787]
6. Evans, MD(2015). Maritime Boundary Delimitation. Oxford: Oxford University Online Handbook.
7. Falsafi, H (2011). Permanent Peace and Sovereignty of Law. Tehran: Farhang No Publishing. (Persian)
8. Ficken, I (1975). "The 1935 Anti-smuggling Act Applied to Hovering Narcotics Smugglers Beyond the Contiguous Zone:An Assessment under International Law". Institutional Repository,University of Miami Law School, 700 (4):15-25.
9. Galdorisi, G & Vienna, K (1997). Beyond the Law of the Sea. United State: The National Information Standards Organization.
10. Goldsmith, J & Posner, E (2005). The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Grisbadarna Case (Norway/Sweden).11 Reports of International Arbitral Awards, 1909.
12. Gulf of Maine Case (United States/Canada). ICJ Reports, 1984.
13. Hackworth, G.H (1941). Two Digest of International Law. Washington: United States Government Printing.
14. Hague Conference on The Codification of International Law (1930).
15. Hugo, G (1916). The Freedom of the Sea, New York: Oxford University Press.
16. ILC (1951). Yearbook. Vol I, Newyork: UN PRESS.
17. Kandes, E & Young, E (2013). "How Customary is Customary International Law?". William & Mary Law Review, 54 (3): 886-920.
18. Klein, N (2011). Maritime Security and The Law of the Sea. United Stated: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566532.001.0001]
19. Kuwahara, T (1992). International Law of the Sea. Osaka: Osaka University Press.
20. League of Nations Treaty Series (1927). Publn. of Treaties & International Engagements Registered W. the Secretariat Etc. Geneva: Secretariat of the league of Nations.
21. North Sea Continental Shelf Case (Federal Republc of Germany, Denmark, The Netherlands). ICJ Reports 1969.
22. Peace Treaty of Fredrikshamn (1809).
23. Santiago Declaration (1952).
24. Scott's, J (1923). "Classics of International Law". The American Journal of International Law, 38 (2): 183-217.
25. Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice (1920).
26. Talaie, F (2019). Sea International Law. 5th ed. Tehran: Jungle Publishing. (Persian)
27. Tanaka, Y (2008). Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of the Maritime Delimitation. US: North American Hart Publishing.
28. The Case of the S.S.Lotus, Permanent Court of International Justice, 1926.
29. Treves, T (2015). Historical Development of the Law of the Sea. Oxford: Oxford HandBook of the Law of the Sea.
30. Tunkin, G (1993). "Is General International Law, Customary Law Only?" European Journal of International Law, 4 (4): 534-541. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035843]
31. USA Presidential Proclamation (1945).
32. Von Liszt, F (1896). International Law:Systematically Represented. Berlin: Springer.
33. Wallace, R (2005). InternationalLaw. London: Sweet & Maxwen.
34. Wood, M (2014). Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission. 2nd Report on Identification of Customary International Law, New York: UN Press.
35. Zarneshan, Sh (2014). Formation and Identifying Customary International Law. Tehran: Shahr Danesh Publishing. (Persian)
36. Zolein, P (2009). Basis of General International Law. Tehran: Political and International Office. (Persian)
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rasoulpour Nalkiashary S, Jafari A, Shaheydar A. Maritime Delimitation Zones in the Framework of Customary Rules. ILR 2020; 1 (4) :33-48
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-57-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 4 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Jan 2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 44 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645