[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 3 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research 2024) ::
ILR 2024, 5(3): 27-38 Back to browse issues page
Coma from the Perspective of Imami Jurisprudence, Medicine and Iranian Criminal Law
Anahita Safapoor1 , Sayed abbas Jazayeri2
1- Ph.D Student, Department of Criminal Law & Criminology, Faculty of Humanity, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law & Criminology, Faculty of Humanity, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Abstract:   (397 Views)
Background and Aim: Coma is a type of brain dysfunction in which a person experiences a severe decrease in their level of consciousness, and the most important characteristic of coma is the inability to regain consciousness; therefore, the sick person cannot regain consciousness through stimuli; therefore, it is necessary to examine the legal provisions and legal and jurisprudential perspectives regarding the type and amount of blood money.
Materials and Methods: The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical.
Ethical Considerations: All ethical principles have been observed in the writing stages of this research.

Findings: One of the challenges for people in a vegetative state is determining the amount of compensation, the type and amount of benefits lost, and the payment of expenses incurred in the vegetative state. In a vegetative state, a person is unable to perform voluntary actions; but they have vital signs. Coma is not a disease, but rather a symptom of a complication and damage to the brain that leads to unconsciousness. The unconsciousness of these people may be short-term or long-term. Accordingly, from a jurisprudential and legal perspective, they are considered conscious. People who suffer from this condition may survive for many years and, although they appear to be conscious, cannot communicate with their surroundings.

Conclusion: Vegetative life is not considered definitive death, and for each of the lost damages and benefits, according to the famous opinion of Imamiyyah jurists, the articles of the Islamic Penal Code, and the rule of non-interference of blood money, blood money, and blood money, separate determinations can be made.
 
Article number: 3
Keywords: Coma, Death, Criminal Law.
Full-Text [PDF 759 kb]   (145 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/06/3 | Revised: 2025/02/19 | Accepted: 2024/08/15 | Published: 2024/09/22
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

safapoor A, jazayeri S A. Coma from the Perspective of Imami Jurisprudence, Medicine and Iranian Criminal Law. ILR 2024; 5 (3) : 3
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-253-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 3 (Interdisciplinary Legal Research 2024) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710