[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2025) ::
ILR 2025, 6(4): 79-0 Back to browse issues page
Abuse of the Right to File Criminal Complaints in Iran’s Criminal Justice System: Professional Complainants and a Balanced Response Model
Amir Golestanimoghadam1 , Mohammad Khani
Abstract:   (1 Views)
Abstract
The right to file a criminal complaint is a core component of victim protection and access to justice. Yet, in exceptional cases, complaint mechanisms may be weaponized to harass, retaliate, obtain illegitimate advantages, or exhaust judicial resources. Iranian law does not recognize “professional complainant” as an autonomous criminal category; therefore, person-based labeling risks deterring legitimate victims. Using a descriptive-analytical and comparative method, this article reframes the issue as abuse of the right to complain and examines Iranian law alongside selected common-law approaches to vexatious litigation and abuse of process. The study finds that repeated complaints, acquittals, or dismissals cannot by themselves establish abuse. Relevant indicators should instead include knowledge of falsity, improper purpose, fabrication or manipulation of evidence, repeated proceedings arising from substantially identical facts, and disproportionate burdens imposed on defendants and judicial institutions. Iranian law contains fragmented responses through constitutional guarantees, criminal procedure rules, defamation-related offences, and the civil-law model of security against vexatious claims, but lacks an integrated criminal-justice management framework. The article proposes a graduated model: early issue-based assessment, privacy-protective linkage of related cases, effective prosecution of fabricated evidence, civil compensation for proven direct loss, and only in exceptional cases narrowly tailored, reviewable filing restrictions. Such a model protects genuine access to justice while preventing the criminal process from becoming an instrument of coercion.
Keywords: Right to Complain; Abuse of Process; Vexatious Litigants; Criminal Justice; False Accusation; Access to Justice
 
Article number: 7
Keywords: Right to Complain, Abuse of Process, Vexatious Litigants, Criminal Justice, False Accusation, Access to Justice
Full-Text [DOCX 62 kb]   (1 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/09/1 | Accepted: 2026/09/3 | Published: 2026/09/3
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

golestanimoghadam A, khani M. Abuse of the Right to File Criminal Complaints in Iran’s Criminal Justice System: Professional Complainants and a Balanced Response Model. ILR 2025; 6 (4) : 7
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-371-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774