[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 5 (12-2026) ::
ILR 2026, 7(5): 101-102 Back to browse issues page
The "Originating Event" Theory and the Three-Step Model for Determining Change of Claim under Article 63 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure (A Comparative Study with French Law)
Fatemeh Kaviani
Department of Law, Go.C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract:   (16 Views)
Article 63 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure prohibits any change to the claim or its value after the first hearing. However, judicial practice lacks a unified criterion for distinguishing a “prohibited change” from a “permissible adjustment,” and this inconsistency has led to conflicting judgments across courts nationwide. Using an analytical-critical method and examining 42 judgments from various branches of the Supreme Court and the Tehran Province Courts of Appeal between 1385 and 1400 (2006–2021), this study proposes the “Originating Event” theory. Under this theory, the criterion is the stability or change of “the set of legal and material events giving rise to the right,” not merely a change in the monetary amount stated in the claim section. The Originating Event theory has three pillars: stability of the elements giving rise to the right, continuity of the legal relationship, and non-creation of a new right. The triple test (substantive characterization, defendant’s defense, good faith) and the three-step model derived from it provide a practical, step-by-step framework for judicial decision-making. A comparative study with French law shows that the French system, with its “sufficient connection” criterion and broad judicial discretion, is more flexible and provides more effective financial sanctions to prevent abuse. Finally, a draft amended article and a set of legislative and executive proposals are presented.
 
Article number: 8
Keywords: Article 63, change of claim, originating event, permissible adjustment, sufficient connection, French law, judicial practice.
Full-Text [DOCX 46 kb]   (2 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/09/29 | Accepted: 2026/10/1 | Published: 2026/10/18
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kaviani F. The "Originating Event" Theory and the Three-Step Model for Determining Change of Claim under Article 63 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure (A Comparative Study with French Law). ILR 2026; 7 (5) : 8
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-386-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 5 (12-2026) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.18 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774