|
Judicial Protection of Citizens' Rights Against Individual Administrative Decisions: A Comparative Study Between Iraq and Egypt
|
Maryam Nabeel Aadi1   , Seyed Ali Mirdamad2 |
1- PhD Student of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.
2- Member of the Scientific Board of the Imam Khomeini Foundation for Higher Education and Research, Iran. |
|
|
Abstract: (10 Views) |
| Judicial review constitutes the substantive guarantee for protecting citizens' rights against administrative abuse and deviation in issuing individual administrative decisions. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of judicial intervention in examining a decision's elements (competence, form, reason, subject, and purpose) and annulling flawed ones, aligning with the hypothesis of transitioning guarantees from formal to substantive. It employs a comparative approach between the Iraqi and Egyptian systems, highlighting the role of their specialized judicial bodies in subjecting the administration to justice. The comparison reveals notable discrepancies in the comprehensiveness of review, institutional independence, procedural speed, and responsiveness to contemporary challenges. Ultimately, the study provides a critical evaluation of both systems' effectiveness in achieving administrative justice, emphasizing the urgent need to develop judicial mechanisms to ensure actual, modern protection of individuals' rights against administrative acts. |
|
|
| Keywords: Judicial Review. Individual Administrative Decisions. Control of Legality. Administrative Abuse. Administrative Justice. |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 626 kb]
(9 Downloads)
|
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2026/10/12 | Accepted: 2026/02/20 | Published: 2026/02/20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
.png)
