[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Publication Ethics::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Copyright
..
Open Access
..
COPE
..
Digital Object Identifier
 
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 5 (2-2026) ::
ILR 2026, 6(5): 21-52 Back to browse issues page
Employee Selection Mechanisms in Iraq, Egypt, and Iran: Assessing Alignment with the Merit Principle
Abstract:   (4 Views)
In Iraq, public sector recruitment mechanisms rely primarily on a centralized employment system for graduates, where top academic performers are automatically hired. However, this system is limited and non-inclusive, often dominated by patronage culture, political connections, or tribal affiliations, resulting in recruitment that lacks competency-based foundations. In Egypt, mechanisms are governed by the new Civil Service Law (No. 81 of 2016), which emphasizes competitive processes and written examinations to ensure transparency. This is further supported by the establishment of Human Resource Management (HRM) units designed to develop assessment models and performance tracking, with a particular focus on enhancing female participation in government competitions to promote meritocracy. In Iran, selection is conducted by centralized committees that evaluate moral, ideological, and professional competencies in accordance with Islamic rationality, guided by laws such as the Teacher and Civil Servant Selection Law; nonetheless, these processes are frequently influenced by political or religious affiliations. The findings indicate that the alignment of recruitment mechanisms with the merit principle in Iraq is very weak, as corruption and hiring based on political and familial ties prevail, leading to an inflation of incompetent personnel and a decline in overall public efficiency. In Egypt, alignment is considered moderate to good, particularly following reforms that strengthen competency-based competition, despite certain implementation challenges that contribute to the gradual improvement of government performance. In Iran, the alignment is mixed; while the system aims for meritocracy through Islamic criteria—such as intelligence and integrity—it is simultaneously influenced by non-professional factors, including beliefs and affiliations, which diminish full transparency
Article number: 2
Keywords: Selection, Merit Principle, Iraq, Egypt, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 744 kb]   (1 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/09/12 | Revised: 2026/09/12 | Accepted: 2026/02/20 | Published: 2026/02/20
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Employee Selection Mechanisms in Iraq, Egypt, and Iran: Assessing Alignment with the Merit Principle. ILR 2026; 6 (5) : 2
URL: http://ilrjournal.ir/article-1-373-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 5 (2-2026) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی تخصصی پژوهش‌های حقوقی میان‌رشته‌ای The Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Legal Research
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.11 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774